One of the most common reasons why many still oppose AI is the perceived loss of control if something goes wrong. There are some outrageous predictions over what could happen if we implement AI in our daily life. I mean, James Cameron and Stanley Kubrick made their careers out of it. More on that later, one cannot help but agree that AI can benefit us greatly if done right.AI has been under experimentation for nearly half a century now. Its widespread application is however still limited to businesses and industry. Assembly lines, day-trading and online social media algorithms are the only ‘real-world’ applications of AI. But even these systems are limited in their capability. Online algorithms and day-trading AI are widely criticized and there is a huge outcry over them which is partly justified. The companies possessing these algorithms aren’t using them ‘ethically’ with prominent AI scientists questioning their practices. Controversies and scandals do occasionally reveal the ugly side of the misuse. However, AI is not the fault here as it’s doing exactly what it was built for. The problem is the people controlling and implementing it. Its the person with the button that controls the technology, not the technology itself and the Cambridge Analytica scandal is the best modern example of the misuse of AI-based applications. Despite this clear distinction, the fear of AI is often based on unrealistic predictions of what AI may end up doing and popular culture is to blame for it. Let’s look at the biggest culprits of the same.
The Role of Pop-Culture
Artificial Intelligence has been around as a concept for quite a long time. AI was first predicted in popular culture long before the invention of even the computer. The notion of machines having human intelligence was first used as a plot point in 1872. Yes, you read that right! The novel Erewhon by Samuel Butler discussed the possibility of machines gaining consciousness which will become the next dominant species thanks to Darwinian selection. Ever since conscious machines became a topic of philosophy, the dystopian view of AI was the first one to be widely accepted by people. The utopian view while more realistic is often disregarded for this dystopia fueled myth. One of the earlier examples includes the play R.U.R by Karel Capek. Shown to audiences in 1920 it is one the first visual representation of rebellious A.I. The German movie, Master of the World, released in 1934 talks of an automated world where the AI villain Wolf, kills its inventor and takes over the world with an army of death-ray equipped robots. Kind of cheesy by modern standards, do remember, it came at a time where the term “AI” hadn’t been coined. Robots were already a thing but they were all analog devices back then. A great example would be Gakutensoku first created in 1929. The 1950s saw a wider knowledge of the possibility of artificial intelligence thanks to the invention of the computer and the explosion of science fiction writers, the likes of Isaac Asimov and Arthur C. Clarke. The popular opinion was dystopian although writers like Asimov didn’t view dystopia due to rebellion but rather extreme levels of ‘benevolent’ guidance. Asimov is known for coining the “Three Laws” which is used for both robotics and AI. It’s also used in many other science fiction novels even today. It was 1968 when this fear, which was originally limited to academic and sophisticated circles, was spread to the masses. Arthur C. Clarke’s career-defining book “2001: A Space Odyssey” was released and made into a movie in the same year. A young Stanley Kubrick made a visual masterpiece of this book, sincerely the best movie on AI ever made. Stanley Kubrick’s finest work(Clockwork Orange comes close), this movie affected film-making, AI philosophy, inter-space travel and also cemented the fear of AI.Intellectual Perspectives
The intellectual perspective on AI usually is more utopian but does acknowledge that AI can go wrong. However, it blames AI going wrong due to the people controlling it or AI becoming misaligned. Make no mistake, sentient AI is not a problem but rather AI whose goals will be misaligned with our goals is the likely ones to resist us. The intellectual and scientific community understands this and is very strong worded about this misinterpretation. Most modern AI is not designed in a way that it ‘freely’ thinks and ‘free’ thinking AIs are actually very limited. It’s mostly acting on a set of preset rules which are set by people who are ‘bad’. As I said earlier, the technology itself is not the problem. You could program your own violent AI but even then the AI would not be ‘free’ thinking but rather doing what you told it to do.One of the major contributors to the fear of AI is its unethical usage since there are endless possibilities of what AI might do and in the wrong hands, it is actually quite dangerous.
Frankenstein Complex
The final major cause for the fear of AI is the Frankenstein Complex.Coined by Isaac Asimov, the Frankenstein Complex theorizes that the elemental reason we fear AI is that it will supersede us.
Related Articles
- How to Set Up Recurring Tasks in Trello
- The Ultimate Guide to Best PagerDuty Integrations
- How to Use Zoom’s Gesture Recognition- Elevate Your Virtual Meetings
- What is Service Recovery? Importance + Examples
- 6 Best Team Chat Apps for Seamless Communication
- MMDU: A Multi-Turn Multi-Image Dialog Understanding Benchmark and Instruction-Tuning Dataset for LVLMs
- Automation, Liquidation and Reverse Logistics
- Benefits and Importance of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs)
- How to Design an Etsy Logo?
- A Beginner’s Guide to Google My Business
Most Popular Posts
- Best Simple Logos with Maximum Impact
- Google Slides vs PowerPoint – Which One is Better for Classroom Presentations
- The Quantum Leap: How Quantum Computing Will Shape the Future of Large Language Models
- 60+ Packaging Designs That Will Make Your Product Stand Out on the Shelf
- How to Cancel YouTube TV & Discover Affordable Streaming Alternatives