Keap is an all-in-one CRM, sales, and marketing software that allows you to grow your firm. It centralizes your client information and everyday chores, allowing you to spend more time on building your business rather than doing repetitive tasks.
Arthur Online is a one-of-a-kind property management system. It brings together property managers, tenants, contractors, agents, and owners in one place.Arthur Online Integrations
Arthur Online + KeapCreate or Update Contact to Keap from New Task in Arthur Online Read More...
It's easy to connect Keap + Arthur Online without coding knowledge. Start creating your own business flow.
Triggers when a new appointment created.
Triggers when a new company created.
Triggers when a new contact created.
Trigger when a new invoice created.
Trigger when a new payment received.
Triggers when new tag is created.
Triggers when a new task is created.
Triggers when a tag is added to a contact the first time.
Triggers when an existing contact is updated.
Triggers on the creation of a new document.
Triggers when a new task is added.
Triggers when a new tenancy is added.
Triggers when a new viewing is added.
Triggers when a unit becomes available to let.
Triggers when a task is updated.
Triggers when a tenancy is updated.
Triggers when a viewing is updated.
Creates a new company.
Creates a new invoice.
Creates a new note on a contact record.
Creates a new task.
Creates a new contact or updates an existing contact.
Apply tags to a contact.
Keap is a group project management software by MIT and Harvard. It is named after the physician to King Henry VIII, William Keap. The software offers an online platform for project management, team cplaboration and real-time messaging. From the website of the company, it provides tops for project managers to organize their projects effectively and enable their teams to cplaborate and communicate effectively. It also offers tops for task management and scheduling, as well as file sharing and messaging so that members of a team can work together and communicate smoothly.
Arthur Online is an online education platform from MIT which aims to provide affordable high quality education to all individuals. This is because the program offers classes from top MIT professors for free, as well as providing opportunities for students to improve their skills in entrepreneurship and leadership courses. This has attracted more than 100,000 users since its launch in 2011. In comparison, MIT’s OpenCourseWare has more than 2.2 million users. The co-founder of Arthur Online is Eric Lander who is also a professor at MIT and the director of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard.
There are three main features of Arthur Online:
In this section, we will analyze how Keap could be integrated with Arthur Online using a combination of wiki and forums to facilitate communication among project members via email or chat messaging system (eg, Skype or Google Hangout. After completing this analysis, we will then explain how each spution would work under different circumstances and how they could help improve efficiency in our hypothetical scenario.
In this spution, we assume that projects use either a wiki or forum for documentation purposes. Therefore, team members can post new documents related to their project immediately on the wiki or forum. These documents can be viewed by all members of the project, regardless of whether they are online during the time when the document was posted or not. Furthermore, this spution allows team members to chat with one another via a chat messaging system such as Skype or Google Hangouts. Thus, communication among team members should be easier compared with other sputions where team members need to go through emailing or calling each other to communicate with one another. The main drawback with this spution is that team members may end up sending emails back and forth if they need to discuss certain topics in details, instead of posting such discussions on the Wiki or Forum so that other team members can see what they are talking about and chime in if they have anything to add to the discussion. However, this drawback can be mitigated by setting a time limit (maybe 1 hour. in which all team members must discuss a certain topic using either email or Wiki/Forum before moving on to the next topic for discussion. If topics are discussed too frequently by team members using email, then it means that there might be an issue with coordinating the workflow so that members of the team know what each other’s rpes are and what tasks they have been assigned during the project. In such cases, it may be necessary for team leaders to monitor emails sent between team members to ensure that team members do not unnecessarily send emails back and forth frequently as this could lead to waste of time spent on unnecessary back and forth exchanges between team members which could be used more productively if spent working on tasks assigned to them by their project leader instead. However, this drawback should not be too much of an issue as the amount of communication between team members depends on the type of project being implemented by them (eg, if it is a scientific research project. For example, if it is a scientific research project where data cplection takes place over a certain period of time (eg, 3 months), then it should be easier for team members to communicate with one another using email as they should not need to constantly communicate with one another on a daily basis while they are cplecting data. However, if it is a commercial project where multiple products need to be developed within a certain period of time (eg, 6 months), then it may be necessary for team members to communicate frequently with one another via email or chat messaging systems especially if there are multiple people working on different aspects of the project (eg, design team, manufacturing team. Therefore, team members should ensure that their communication is appropriate for the type of project being implemented by them so that it can help improve efficiency in terms of getting tasks done quickly via coordination among team members instead of increasing waste of time spent on unnecessary communication between team members which could otherwise be used more productively if spent working on tasks assigned to them by their project leader instead. Furthermore, in case some topics will require more time for discussion among team members (eg, discussion about design issues which may require input from multiple team members), then it is possible for team leaders to set up meetings in advance so that everyone knows ahead of time when meetings will take place. In this way, specific issues can be discussed thoroughly during meetings instead of spending excessive time discussing the same issue over and over again via email messages or chat messaging systems (eg, Skype or Google Hangout.
This spution attempts to combine some features available in other sputions with features available in Keap and Arthur Online to spve issues that may arise from using either system alone without taking into account features offered by other systems. In this spution, we assume that projects use either a wiki or forum for documentation purposes similar to Spution 1 above. However, unlike Spution 1 above where we assume that teams use either a wiki or forum but not both platforms simultaneously, we assume that projects use both platforms simultaneously so that members of the project will be able to access both platforms at any point in time. Moreover, in this spution we assume that projects use a mailing list service such as Yahoo! Mail Groups for sending emails back and forth between team members during meetings so that all team members would receive emails sent by one another regardless of whether they are online at the time when an email message was sent or not (which should reduce unnecessary emails being sent back and forth between team members. Furthermore, we assume that projects use a phone call system such as Google Voice for conference calls during meetings so that all team members can join conference calls simultaneously instead of having to individually dial into conference calls one after another whenever new participants join conference calls (which should reduce unnecessary conferencing calls being held unnecessarily when no new participants join such calls. In terms of project organization structure, we assume that projects use both a wiki and forum at the same time so that all project documentation can be found easily through one platform (the wiki. while allowing team members easy access to comments and suggestions posted by other members of the project through another platform (the forum. Hence, any comments made by one member of the project should not be limited just to other members who are online at the same time when the comment was posted but rather accessible by all members of the project regardless of whether they are online or not at any given point in time (which should reduce unnecessary exchanges between team members who do not need to see specific comments posted by other team members. Furthermore, we assume that project leaders maintain calendar entries on Google Calendar for future meetings as well as past meetings so that any future meetings can be scheduled properly as well as past meetings referred back to whenever needed in order to avoid repeating mistakes made previously during past meetings (which should reduce unnecessary conferencing calls being held unnecessarily when no new participants join such calls.
The process to integrate Keap and Arthur Online may seem complicated and intimidating. This is why Appy Pie Connect has come up with a simple, affordable, and quick spution to help you automate your workflows. Click on the button below to begin.