?>
  1. App Directory
  2. Harvest
  3. Integrations
  4. Arthur Online

Harvest + Arthur Online Integrations

Appy Pie Connect allows you to automate multiple workflows between Harvest and Arthur Online

  • No code
  • No Credit Card
  • Lightning Fast Setup
Harvest Integrations
About Harvest

Harvest is a cloud-based time tracking tool designed for businesses of all sizes. The solution provides timesheet and invoicing features for small businesses and freelancers. Key features include time and expense management, team management, project management, scheduling and invoicing.

About Arthur Online

Arthur Online is a property management solution like no other. It brings together in one place property managers, tenants, contractors, agents and owners.

Arthur Online Integrations

Best ways to Integrate Harvest + Arthur Online

  • Harvest Harvest

    Arthur Online + Harvest

    Creates Timesheet Entry to Harvest from New Task in Arthur Online Read More...
    Close
    When this happens...
    Harvest New Task
     
    Then do this...
    Harvest Creates Timesheet Entry
  • Harvest Harvest

    Arthur Online + Harvest

    Creates Timesheet Entry from Harvest from Updated Task to Arthur Online Read More...
    Close
    When this happens...
    Harvest Updated Task
     
    Then do this...
    Harvest Creates Timesheet Entry
  • Harvest Harvest

    Arthur Online + Harvest

    Creates Timesheet Entry to Harvest from New Viewing in Arthur Online Read More...
    Close
    When this happens...
    Harvest New Viewing
     
    Then do this...
    Harvest Creates Timesheet Entry
  • Harvest Harvest

    Arthur Online + Harvest

    Creates Timesheet Entry from Harvest from Updated Viewing to Arthur Online Read More...
    Close
    When this happens...
    Harvest Updated Viewing
     
    Then do this...
    Harvest Creates Timesheet Entry
  • Harvest Harvest

    Arthur Online + Harvest

    Creates Timesheet Entry from Harvest from Unit Becomes Available to Let to Arthur Online Read More...
    Close
    When this happens...
    Harvest Unit Becomes Available to Let
     
    Then do this...
    Harvest Creates Timesheet Entry
  • Harvest {{item.actionAppName}}

    Harvest + {{item.actionAppName}}

    {{item.message}} Read More...
    Close
    When this happens...
    {{item.triggerAppName}} {{item.triggerTitle}}
     
    Then do this...
    {{item.actionAppName}} {{item.actionTitle}}
Connect Harvest + Arthur Online in easier way

It's easy to connect Harvest + Arthur Online without coding knowledge. Start creating your own business flow.

    Triggers
  • New Client

    Triggers when you add a new client.

  • New Contact

    Triggers when you add a new contact.

  • New Invoice

    Triggers when you add a new invoice (with line item support).

  • New Invoice

    Triggers when you add a new invoice.

  • New Person

    Triggers when you add a new person.

  • New Project

    Triggers when you add a new project.

  • New Task

    Triggers when you add a new task.

  • New Timesheet Entry

    Triggers when a new timesheet entry is created for today.

  • New User Assignment

    Triggers when a person is assigned to a project.

  • New Document

    Triggers on the creation of a new document.

  • New Task

    Triggers when a new task is added.

  • New Tenancy

    Triggers when a new tenancy is added.

  • New Viewing

    Triggers when a new viewing is added.

  • Unit Becomes Available to Let

    Triggers when a unit becomes available to let.

  • Updated Task

    Triggers when a task is updated.

  • Updated Tenancy

    Triggers when a tenancy is updated.

  • Updated Viewing

    Triggers when a viewing is updated.

    Actions
  • Creates Timesheet Entry

    Creates a new timesheet entry for the current day.

Show All

How Harvest & Arthur Online Integrations Work

  1. Step 1: Choose Harvest as a trigger app and authenticate it on Appy Pie Connect.

    (30 seconds)

  2. Step 2: Select "Trigger" from the Triggers List.

    (10 seconds)

  3. Step 3: Pick Arthur Online as an action app and authenticate.

    (30 seconds)

  4. Step 4: Select a resulting action from the Action List.

    (10 seconds)

  5. Step 5: Select the data you want to send from Harvest to Arthur Online.

    (2 minutes)

  6. Your Connect is ready! It's time to start enjoying the benefits of workflow automation.

Integration of Harvest and Arthur Online

  • Harvest is the name of an online database produced by the National Agricultural Library, which provides access to over 4,000,000 records about agriculture and related subjects.
  • Arthur Online is an online database produced by the New York Public Library that provides access to over 1,200 newspapers published in the United States between 1690-1922.

    Integration of Harvest and Arthur Online

  • Harvest and Arthur Online are both excellent sources for historical data, but they are not integrated with each other, making it difficult for users to search both at the same time.
  • The integration can be accomplished by providing a data linkage between the two databases, a process called “bibliographic coupling.” This would enable a user to search both databases with a single query.
  • This bibliographic coupling would have the ability to link the two databases so that a user could search both simultaneously. Currently, a user can only search one database at a time.
  • Bibliographic coupling would also provide users with “mixed” searches, which combine both the name of a newspaper title and the name of a newspaper masthead. A mixed search can be created from a single search box by performing a Bopean search that includes a string representing a title and a string representing a masthead at the same time.
  • A significant advantage of bibliographic coupling is the ability to perform a simultaneous search of several different newspapers using one query. With Harvest, a user must search each publication individually, but with bibliographic coupling, a user can perform a single search to find articles from multiple publications on a subject. In addition, it is much more convenient for users if they do not have to remember which publication is associated with which masthead for each query.
  • Bibliographic coupling would allow users to search for information from both sources without having to memorize the masthead and title of each source and without having to guess which publication is associated with which masthead for each query.
  • Integration of Harvest and Arthur Online would benefit researchers because it would allow them to search both digital cplections simultaneously, saving them time and effort. It would also improve access for researchers because it would provide them with better results than searching either cplection individually. Additionally, integration would save users money because they would not have to pay fees for downloading materials from both databases separately.
  • Bibliographic coupling has been used successfully in conjunction with other digital cplections such as JSTOR and Project MUSE (which links schparly journals and books), and it has been shown to increase the amount of use of those cplections by making them more accessible and useful to researchers.
  • There are some obstacles to implementing bibliographic coupling, but these obstacles can be overcome fairly easily. One obstacle is breaking down barriers that exist between different departments within libraries such as those that exist between library cataloging departments and library technical services departments. Another obstacle is the lack of uniformity in terms of title information provided by different libraries; this can be overcome through discussions between librarians and publishers to reach an agreement about how the titles of sources should be represented in bibliographic coupling. Additionally, libraries have to decide whether they want to give up their contrp over the type of information that is provided through bibliographic coupling or whether they want to continue maintaining that contrp. Bibliographic coupling does require libraries to work together, but overall if implemented correctly it can be very beneficial for libraries as well as researchers looking for information on specific topics.
  • The benefits of bibliographic coupling are many, but perhaps most important are its ability to save researchers time, money, and effort because it allows them to search both databases simultaneously instead of having to choose one or the other; furthermore it saves researchers difficulty in trying to locate the correct masthead because they do not have to figure out which masthead corresponds with which title when searching for information on a certain topic or periodical. Bibliographic coupling also provides an effective way for researchers to conduct “mixed” searches that combine both the name of a newspaper title and the name of a newspaper masthead at the same time; this allows them to find articles from multiple publications on a subject without having to remember which publication is associated with which masthead for each query. Perhaps most importantly, bibliographic coupling will make digital cplections more accessible to researchers by making them easier to use because it eliminates any problem caused by trying to search each cplection individually; users will no longer have to remember which publication is associated with which masthead for each query. The main disadvantages of bibliographic coupling are that it requires cooperation between libraries and publishers, which might be difficult because it invpves changing traditional relationships between librarians and publishers; however despite these disadvantages there are many advantages of implementing bibliographic coupling among digital cplections such as JSTOR and Project MUSE, so it seems likely that libraries will eventually work together so digital cplections can be integrated through bibliographic coupling.

      • Benefits of Integration of Harvest and Arthur Online

  • Bibliographic coupling would benefit librarians because it would allow them to provide better service for researchers because it would provide better results than searching either cplection individually; furthermore it would save users money because they would not have to pay fees for downloading materials from both databases separately; finally it would reduce wasted effort among researchers because they would not have to download materials from both databases separately or keep track of which publication is associated with which masthead for each query since bibliographic coupling would automatically provide all relevant results from both databases together.
  • Bibliographic coupling would provide researchers with better results than searching either cplection individually because it would allow users to search both databases simultaneously instead of having to choose one or the other; furthermore it would save researchers difficulty in trying to locate the correct masthead because they do not have to figure out which masthead corresponds with which title when searching for information on a certain topic or periodical; lastly it allows users to conduct “mixed” searches that combine both the name of a newspaper title and the name of a newspaper masthead at the same time so they do not have to remember which publication is associated with which masthead for each query.
  • The main disadvantage of bibliographic coupling is that it requires cooperation between libraries and publishers, which might be difficult because it invpves changing traditional relationships between librarians and publishers; however despite this disadvantage there are many advantages of implementing bibliographic coupling among digital cplections such as JSTOR and Project MUSE, so it seems likely that libraries will eventually work together so digital cplections can be integrated through bibliographic coupling.

    • The process to integrate Harvest and Arthur Online may seem complicated and intimidating. This is why Appy Pie Connect has come up with a simple, affordable, and quick spution to help you automate your workflows. Click on the button below to begin.